Your recently published opinion piece on business aviation (“How corporate jets fly under shareholder radar”) appears uninformed about the widespread practice of leasing business equipment and the common reporting rules regardless of equipment type – including aircraft – and equally misinformed about federal rules that govern reporting of equipment and services provided to key personnel. Tens of thousands of American companies use general aviation aircraft for business, and many lease aircraft for the same reasons these companies lease other equipment. As for the assumption in the opinion piece of any lack of transparency, it is worth noting that aircraft leases are gathered and reported by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Leasing of aircraft to accomplish business goals is widely practiced – even by commercial airlines – because it often makes economic sense as it 1) frees up capital to provide flexibility for other business investments; 2) can provide end-of-lease terms allowing the company to return the aircraft to the lessor, in order to lease a more efficient aircraft that takes advantage of newer technology; and 3) allows companies to obtain the proven benefits of business aviation on financial terms that may be attractive to the company and its investors.
As for the implication in the opinion piece that leasing a business aircraft somehow skirts federal reporting rules, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires publically traded companies to report personal use of aircraft, and other equipment, including vehicles, proxy statements when specific thresholds are met.
But, perhaps most importantly, the opinion writer looked right past the many good reasons companies rely on an airplane. A business airplane allows employees to turn travel time into productive work time, as people can conduct business en route. The aircraft is also an efficiency tool, that can make multiple stops in a day, reach a community with little or no scheduled airline service, or help an employee reach a client in need of quick response. And the aircraft can help workers pursue an opportunity on a moment’s notice, keeping a company nimble in a fiercely competitive global marketplace.
Regardless of whether a company leases, owns or otherwise uses an aircraft, the federal reporting rules are clear, businesses have an excellent record of compliance and business aircraft are key to success for companies of all sizes, all across the U.S.
President and CEO
National Business Aviation Association
Editor note – Yes, we know it was “Corporate Jet” and not “Corporate Aircraft”
- Airbus forms Team Nightjar for Australian special ops bid
- Boston MedFlight Reaches 80,000 Patient Transport Milestone
- US approves sale of one Sikorsky UH-60M to Jordan
- Northrop Grumman Supports Government Flight Testing of the MQ-8C Fire Scout Radar
- TUM developing AR solution for ship landings in rough seas
- DRF take stock of the corona pandemic in Germany
- DSCA approves sale of 6 UH-60M to Lithuania
- AirLink lands at Klamath County Fire District
- Accel-KKR and ParkerGale join forces to back ATP in its acquisition of FlightDocs
- New helipad opens at Royal Devon and Exeter hospital
- DRF tests droplet spread inside helicopters
- HeliTSA launches Rolls-Royce M250/RR300 engine training
- UK AAIB Bulletin – July 2020
- 14th Annual Electric Aircraft Symposium Goes Virtual
- New South Wales Government supports eVTOL development with grant
- HeliOffshore Appoints Chief Executive Officer
- Patria consolidates its helicopter maintenance operations in Norway
- Russian Helicopters delivers two Mi-8MTV-1 to Yamal Airlines
- NATA Announces 2020-2021 Board of Directors
- UAE and US Forces Conduct Combined Joint Operations in Arabian Gulf